I'm a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Is the Optimal Solution for US Health System

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare it to what average American pays. I know multiple clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.

Amanda Andrews
Amanda Andrews

A passionate gamer and tech writer with over a decade of experience covering industry trends and game development.